SEE: SEGUE OF INTENIONS...(below)
9-28-12 [un(fn) since 9-21]
Butt bottoms up!
but: Yes-Butt Head in the Wrong Direction?
to: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/04/who-are-they-calling-elitist.html*
not: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/06/cap-and-trade.html
one: (b.s.) trickle + down
do: (b.s.) voodoo + economics
538: (scroll
compare: over)*
what Think Progress 96%
math (trouble with the curve)
d (w'rithmatic)
(*) satire + mockery
(b.s.): pun + (sic)
(**) total eclipse of the
*under construction
9-21-12 REFRAIN
is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]
9-21-12 Ding, Ding, Ding (rough RE-draft)
[see Devo Mitt's BO*Son below]
9-21-12 Ding,
Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding!
[Pulled from Circulation(Reverted to Draft) for Re-frame]
It is a hecuva job to footnote this. The Dings are about the fight and the perspectives.
4 Now I will just begin UC(under construction)
! Punderous
Ponderings
? The Choice (4mat anomoly? )
C not but Al Gore Rhythms (retro ^)
[talk about (fn) nightmare of GPS]
[retro ^ = anachronism/time wrap/warp?]
etc Theology
Re Trinity
Material Off-Cuff
edited Charlotte
2012! [^ C ?]
track (label charts[PAGES])
to (blog search E.B.)
The
Hope
darn knit(C ? Rythms ^)
Why OWS is Bigger than Left Vs. Right!
Only Economists Need Apply
hard (b.s Charlotte's Web)
---
risked (INET)
un (obtusity)
prophetic (dimentionalism)
---
Oh Obama Revives Social Security Idea: Raise Payroll Tax Cap To Replenish Fund
Point Professor Warren's Lesson
3 (prophetic/refrain) (NOT)
Ding: A return to economic sanity.
--\-- 4UC (line #3)
[devo]: Mitt's
BO*Son (i.e. flip-flop of
--/--
A A return to economic sanity ?[*]
B Self Bernanke Myth (Fed Speak)
C Deflation Jon Stewart (Satire nor Economics)
D (60 Minutes) context
Lede^^: Tacky, tact, tack
Crack: Economy or Economics
"I don't want to be subjective...(but)^^^
^^ 47% Myth
^^^ Fight of the Century (Good Wrap: Bad Econ)
[*] This footnote segues between Ding and A. leaving out the middle and emblematic of Mitt and his flip-flop of economics.(@A) It is Keynesian not Supply or Demand. The Fight of the Century(@but) is a mockery of a satire on economics and the Deflation of Bernanke by Jon Stewart(@C) is a satire of a mockery of economics. .
9-19-12 Re:Focus
TIME Romney Refocuses as Obama Decries ‘Victim’ Claim
NFRY=(not fully read yet)
Is Klein on anyones side?[!]
[!]= ;-) If you don't know, scroll(and go click)yourself!
Hint: Goat Mountain ?
9-18-12 ...promote
the general...
9-18-12
MB: No Apologies Tour? [UNDER (DE?)CONSTRUCTION]
Correction Leding Entitlement Group?
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49065421 Ryan
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076540
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076662 full leder
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076662
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076663 the cycle
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076582
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49073645 the place
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49074910 Andrea http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49074064 NOW
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/middle-east-&-n.-africa/49075550/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/south-&-central-asia/49075904/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/decision-2012/49075790/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49077139/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49076662/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065518/#49065518
Hardball and math death.
Bottom line update top lines and MB.
and who home runs?
9-18-12 Trouble
with the Curve?
...promote
the general...
9-17-12 One
Heckuva Day. The Dickens...(peace meal [!])
Obama
the Uniter!
9-14-12 Politics
is local?
sausage: Ground
Romney/Ryan/Rand: Game
beef : ?
*
footnotes: Not
out foxed
the
Seattle PI
usual
global text
MO.**
** "well"
not: Rhetorical Been Laden In-Chief?!
exactly:
Fed/Bernanke/Seattle PI
9-13-12 Rhetorical
Been Laden[*] In-Chief [asterisk added (9-14) for English emphasis]
This [fn] under-construction and challenging. [comment embedded here (see English emphasis) as well]
SEGUE OF INTENTIONS GOING FORWARD:
FOOTNOTES (see label) BY MONTH. (under construction)
SCROLLING DOWN DATE OF INSERT WILL NOT BE INCLUDED UNLESS THERE IS AN UPDATE TO NOTE.
9-13-12 Links [update change]
Having instituted new footnote process here.[*]dupe applicable
9-13-12 Refrain post frain?[*]
satire: Mitt + BO*son
mockery: Fall-Awful
on Mitt's Face!
later: frain
4 huff posts
Dangerous
Narratives
Whose
Maker
Obama
Role
The
Bounce?
NFRY
* BaneOr
Out
Foxed?
Rubric's
Peek
"Feel
the Love"?
Not
to Follow-Up...
String
Cheese Theory?
First
Downgrade in US History!
Ideology
anachronism foray
Un-State
of the Union
Conservative
Foray (4A)
intended CAD
CAD
(2 out of 3 be bad)
CAD
(Culturally Aided Design)
CAD
(To be or not 3d)
State
of Politics
[Edits occurring post footnote @ some*** are not included in this footnote process as hinted at: *** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what
the
google[anachronism
unintended]
or is
it? ]
*** also not included here
[*]asterisks will appear bracketed by date, but unbracketed are from original post: *
anachronism
intended will appear in bold, followed by the contents of the b.s. [**]
[**] the exception to the rule [***]
[***] i.e. what the google you scroll over or click for link
ALSO post asterisk *** bracketeds not included here.
9-12-12 Fall-Awful
on Mitt's Face!
Footnoes under construction...
September
11th
heading*[^^]
[latest]
9-11-12 Forward?
the only link to outside source: (9-12) Politics
9-7-12 Other
Mysterious Ways...
Heavy (GWB) on Huffington Post and b.s. (vous due[sic])
[selected links are footnoted]
There (HP) Climate Change not a Hoax
is (HP) Artists Against Fracking (Ono/Lennon)
W*(b.s.) Google Works
rithmatic
(TLR)Four More Years
and (ibid) Mitts BO*son
After
Math. (HP) BP/Isaac .
Un-bolded Under-construction, peace meal [!].
9-7-12 Google
Works...
9-5-12 Four
More Years!
9-4-12 Charlotte
2012!
Out
Foxed?
9-2-12 For
Pete Sake!
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query google. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query google. Sort by date Show all posts
Saturday, September 01, 2012
Friday, December 04, 2009
Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.
you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)
[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]
Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.
footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]
[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.
[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]
1-9-14 Kant we all ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches? No. Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics? Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant. Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics. Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee. (G'Ribble Label?)
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)
[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]
It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.
Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.
footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]
[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.
[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]
1-9-14 Kant we all ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches? No. Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics? Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant. Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics. Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee. (G'Ribble Label?)
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
What are the Frackin' Odds...
it's the frackin' spin!(?)
Well actually the original intent was the timing thing.
What are the odds, if you listen to Stephanie Miller and you google, you will find. Now...actually* before I take too many tangents I will simply fade...
(but with the intent to later find three points indicate a circle.)
...but it was not a tangent, it was the punchline of the google crack above.
Rather than explain the tangent or run the odds**, I will just note the connection point of contact in Exceptionalism.
* this was an odd thing and find. Below the you listen, and you google are what I believe few knew if it is true. That when Obama was blamed for saying there were 57 states and that that was Islamic, that there were actually 57 jurisdictions in the electoral process including uncommitteds?
**run is a pun on Runes and odds is a play on THE Pythagoras WAY.
[It is awkard to reflect the actual timeline but I did finish this post, and not POST it till I remembered to POST The Tetrahedron? post.]
[And wish to note that I am very concerned about Japan, but is there ever a time to let one's guard or humor down? But all humor is not created equal, let alone meaning.]
[BTW: Is there any meaning in Frackin' being a play on words, math, and related to energy? I will let you search for that, but it is not the ribble. Nor was it my intent.]
Well actually the original intent was the timing thing.
What are the odds, if you listen to Stephanie Miller and you google, you will find. Now...actually* before I take too many tangents I will simply fade...
(but with the intent to later find three points indicate a circle.)
...but it was not a tangent, it was the punchline of the google crack above.
Rather than explain the tangent or run the odds**, I will just note the connection point of contact in Exceptionalism.
* this was an odd thing and find. Below the you listen, and you google are what I believe few knew if it is true. That when Obama was blamed for saying there were 57 states and that that was Islamic, that there were actually 57 jurisdictions in the electoral process including uncommitteds?
**run is a pun on Runes and odds is a play on THE Pythagoras WAY.
[It is awkard to reflect the actual timeline but I did finish this post, and not POST it till I remembered to POST The Tetrahedron? post.]
[And wish to note that I am very concerned about Japan, but is there ever a time to let one's guard or humor down? But all humor is not created equal, let alone meaning.]
[BTW: Is there any meaning in Frackin' being a play on words, math, and related to energy? I will let you search for that, but it is not the ribble. Nor was it my intent.]
Monday, January 16, 2012
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
For the first time his memorial will be open on his day.
Today I am refraining from ledership or word play.
But nature or nurture, it is also a snow day.
Not to rhyme or reason*, but not a bad segue.
[Word play & links* are more Google than nature or nurture.]
* i.e. results** are more Google than intent
** links are NFRY***
[Now with Alex Wagner or earlier.]
[Andrea Mitchell documents]
*** 1-17-12 see Navigation/Labels
(NFRY to be explained.)
[NOTE: To Be Arranged. i.e. next post
At the present time the BLOG ARCHIVE is the right column mentioned there.
I am having format/template issues, see Under Construction.(labels and scroll over or down)
Older Posts is a new feature.(1st uses noted in preceding links)]
I have been lax in following the Republican debates, not that they were worth anything till recently. It may now be different with the caucus and primaries begun. Ron Paul may have fanciful economics but the golden rule is key to our differences.]
< previous post >
Today I am refraining from ledership or word play.
But nature or nurture, it is also a snow day.
Not to rhyme or reason*, but not a bad segue.
[Word play & links* are more Google than nature or nurture.]
* i.e. results** are more Google than intent
** links are NFRY***
[Now with Alex Wagner or earlier.]
[Andrea Mitchell documents]
*** 1-17-12 see Navigation/Labels
(NFRY to be explained.)
[NOTE: To Be Arranged. i.e. next post
At the present time the BLOG ARCHIVE is the right column mentioned there.
I am having format/template issues, see Under Construction.(labels and scroll over or down)
Older Posts is a new feature.(1st uses noted in preceding links)]
I have been lax in following the Republican debates, not that they were worth anything till recently. It may now be different with the caucus and primaries begun. Ron Paul may have fanciful economics but the golden rule is key to our differences.]
< previous post >
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Tetrahedron Files
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Borrowed Comment!
* * *
[CAUTION NOTED 8-20-07: The first link below (Wake Up America) appears to cause my internet connection to experience difficulties when visiting it. So proceed to that link at your own risk! This is not a self-serving literary ploy. ]
* * * [The orginal post will not be touched,
See comments for anything more. 8-20-07]
* * *
* * * Wake Up America! CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * *
Coming across this blogger, by doing a Google on Military Support Bush or Military Poll to find that Karl Rove is right, there are no links to (at least easily found) showing lack of military support for Bush. * But I did not find Rove's outlandish quote that "the troops get what they want and need". It seems that justifies what the administration says if they have the same sources and carefully navigate the intelligence.
On the other hand, I found some preemptive comments that may have played a role or seen the Rove role change coming or cause it. The latter first: Take it to Karl The former earlier: Karen Hughes: Karl Rove’s Kryptonite Oops, two years too early. Seen what coming or caused?
Bush should have been awoken much earlier, and we tried. Seriously, the guest comment, not that she is aware of my blog, hit a few points, Rove, the trooops/ Iraq, and Hillary with a few good links that I have yet to read, and will save comment for later. Suffice to say that it takes some filtering of the filter and there is more than fertilizer in them there hills, or links.
Oh heck I will touch on a few: Rove is a heck of a filter of fertilizer and the media as well. His comments on the troops, and his comment on Hillary, navigate though or pile on the fertilizer to some reality. And on "the surge", another cautious step through the piles of it.
* [posted and paused to continue: granted a little more search will find more, and in fact with my sources and rambling will probably stumble on me, but the point that I was going to make before I did undue diligence and tried to find some facts, is that polling the military may give a biased result based on two aspects, the filtering of their information and their freedom. Heck, I just threw in the Google as it was really a hit.
Pardon my vocabulary, but no more from the administration. Enough!
[11:19 AM my initial intrigue with the top link was due to my own spin on Rove, Hillary and Iraq/Troop intelligence, which I wove into my commentary but which may require more "hard work" either by the viewer or as my own reviewer. * * * CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK ! hehe * * * (now that is a hint)]]
[CAUTION NOTED 8-20-07: The first link below (Wake Up America) appears to cause my internet connection to experience difficulties when visiting it. So proceed to that link at your own risk! This is not a self-serving literary ploy. ]
* * * [The orginal post will not be touched,
See comments for anything more. 8-20-07]
* * *
* * * Wake Up America! CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * *
Coming across this blogger, by doing a Google on Military Support Bush or Military Poll to find that Karl Rove is right, there are no links to (at least easily found) showing lack of military support for Bush. * But I did not find Rove's outlandish quote that "the troops get what they want and need". It seems that justifies what the administration says if they have the same sources and carefully navigate the intelligence.
On the other hand, I found some preemptive comments that may have played a role or seen the Rove role change coming or cause it. The latter first: Take it to Karl The former earlier: Karen Hughes: Karl Rove’s Kryptonite Oops, two years too early. Seen what coming or caused?
Bush should have been awoken much earlier, and we tried. Seriously, the guest comment, not that she is aware of my blog, hit a few points, Rove, the trooops/ Iraq, and Hillary with a few good links that I have yet to read, and will save comment for later. Suffice to say that it takes some filtering of the filter and there is more than fertilizer in them there hills, or links.
Oh heck I will touch on a few: Rove is a heck of a filter of fertilizer and the media as well. His comments on the troops, and his comment on Hillary, navigate though or pile on the fertilizer to some reality. And on "the surge", another cautious step through the piles of it.
* [posted and paused to continue: granted a little more search will find more, and in fact with my sources and rambling will probably stumble on me, but the point that I was going to make before I did undue diligence and tried to find some facts, is that polling the military may give a biased result based on two aspects, the filtering of their information and their freedom. Heck, I just threw in the Google as it was really a hit.
Pardon my vocabulary, but no more from the administration. Enough!
[11:19 AM my initial intrigue with the top link was due to my own spin on Rove, Hillary and Iraq/Troop intelligence, which I wove into my commentary but which may require more "hard work" either by the viewer or as my own reviewer. * * * CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK ! hehe * * * (now that is a hint)]]
Friday, August 24, 2012
Guns, Gads and Google!
You can't handle the rove or son of... an Oldsmobile.
The last link was not where I was coming from, exactly.
Original heading or rather point of departure? Etch-a-Sketch 3.0
Romney, Ryan, Republican Con Vent Shun-all-ism from The Cycle*.
Reference Lede-or Ship: "Ironic Post Birtherism" or what I would call Charlie McCarthyism** to a new level.
* link to be inserted
(Actually NOW w/Alex Wagner)
[A bit on my own Mitt Flop.]
** no...thanks to the fates[!]
(Reference to Google/b.s. / scroll-over not RIP)
[roving on to WMD: Willard Mitt on Decon-structured]
[Not The Cycle either, but son of a gun.]
The last link was not where I was coming from, exactly.
Original heading or rather point of departure? Etch-a-Sketch 3.0
Romney, Ryan, Republican Con Vent Shun-all-ism from The Cycle*.
Reference Lede-or Ship: "Ironic Post Birtherism" or what I would call Charlie McCarthyism** to a new level.
* link to be inserted
(Actually NOW w/Alex Wagner)
[A bit on my own Mitt Flop.]
** no...thanks to the fates[!]
(Reference to Google/b.s. / scroll-over not RIP)
[roving on to WMD: Willard Mitt on Decon-structured]
[Not The Cycle either, but son of a gun.]
Friday, September 07, 2012
Google Works...
in Mysterious Ways!
Or YouTube [!]
Now... the rest of the Harvey, for Pete sake (and Mary).^^
What transpired this morning was opening my blog from my desktop and reading "Mysterious "(scroll over or click on). A Ty Cobb reference was embedded in my post. He was also embedded(earlier) in a family photo as a frame liner or stuffing in the form of a Seattle papers sports section. His batting average was around .410 at the time. The photo is of my grandfather on skid row. (I walk past it every day as I come down the stairs for breakfast.) But it was not our dad's Skid Road. It was a logging camp taken by an historic*** photographer with my granfather proudly centered.
Literal Flip-flop?**
Not to tangent.*
[sorry for the anachronistic asterisks]
Obama is Ty Cobb in the following context:
We are the borg, not the cable guy or Picards.
* Is of sorts a tangent, as in a recent encounter with "Proust"
** link 2 "Ways" black and white
*** the one on my wall has not been found online, but found the 3rd link under the historic*** YouTube.
^ Bush league
[In context? Not to pun.]
^^ [Post edited for Pete..."sake (and Mary)"]
FOOTNOTE: The third link is high-lighted. The balance is how we get there. The Mysterious Picards the content of context.
Or YouTube [!]
Now... the rest of the Harvey, for Pete sake (and Mary).^^
What transpired this morning was opening my blog from my desktop and reading "Mysterious "(scroll over or click on). A Ty Cobb reference was embedded in my post. He was also embedded(earlier) in a family photo as a frame liner or stuffing in the form of a Seattle papers sports section. His batting average was around .410 at the time. The photo is of my grandfather on skid row. (I walk past it every day as I come down the stairs for breakfast.) But it was not our dad's Skid Road. It was a logging camp taken by an historic*** photographer with my granfather proudly centered.
Literal Flip-flop?**
Not to tangent.*
[sorry for the anachronistic asterisks]
Obama is Ty Cobb in the following context:
The saying "All is fair in love and war" comes to mind. A google search brought up reference to Ty Cobb’s ability to stretch the rules and was used in reference to modern business tactics. Business aside, though that is the world he^ came from, it is interesting that some^ would make more rules (whether for couples or nations) when they in particular have trouble with following those that exist.(but on the level field of dreams.)
We are the borg, not the cable guy or Picards.
* Is of sorts a tangent, as in a recent encounter with "Proust"
** link 2 "Ways" black and white
*** the one on my wall has not been found online, but found the 3rd link under the historic*** YouTube.
^ Bush league
[In context? Not to pun.]
^^ [Post edited for Pete..."sake (and Mary)"]
FOOTNOTE: The third link is high-lighted. The balance is how we get there. The Mysterious Picards the content of context.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Pay Dirt / Tax Mud
Rachel Maddow rakes over Senator Kyl for his not intending to make "factual statements" shovel.*
He never actually said X, but effectively and economically, Y is the same thing. Except when it is for the 99%. Tax cuts for the 1% do not need to be paid for. Also not extending the Bush tax cuts, is a tax increase. But tax cuts for the 99%, those need to be paid for, and not extending them are not a tax increase.
I think the slogan "NO NEW TAXES" is very Democratic, give us the old taxes. And a new Texas might not hurt.

*12-1-11 bold and link added: X-mass L[!] & Google** of the day***.
** if capitalized, I give credit where due, if not, then it is like clean-X, or ex-finity? And there is always the upper-L search box.
***LSM Clinton[/](Lewinsky)Scandal MoveOn (Truly[*iv] Never Never Land)
*iv: see 3 minutes in till you google, Republicans say raise taxes(po lls ).
[* Follow-up]
[X= "I have never said that all tax cuts always pay for themselves."
Y= "You should never have to off-set the cost of a deliberate decision to reduce tax rates on Americans..."
Senator Kyl is not lying about what he has never said, literally, but see chart, and how tax cuts pay for themselves. But there is a two fold problem here. One, following my words in the equation. Two, following the chart. But it seems to me that actually, in the Permanent Tax Cuts category, it would be even harder to say. But it does seem to show a relative benefit to old tax rates mixed with Obama tax rates, and flip-flopping the Republican tax policy, as we have virtual mud from the trickle-down. And we even have pun with the bank and the cave.]
XIV: allegory of the cave (a,b,c,d,e)
or singular(a,b, c ,d,e,f,g,h,i,j)
[hint C.3: MoveOn / GPS]
[Last UL Search (a,b,c,d)]
Speaking of mud. RM Glitch host.
He never actually said X, but effectively and economically, Y is the same thing. Except when it is for the 99%. Tax cuts for the 1% do not need to be paid for. Also not extending the Bush tax cuts, is a tax increase. But tax cuts for the 99%, those need to be paid for, and not extending them are not a tax increase.
I think the slogan "NO NEW TAXES" is very Democratic, give us the old taxes. And a new Texas might not hurt.

*12-1-11 bold and link added: X-mass L[!] & Google** of the day***.
** if capitalized, I give credit where due, if not, then it is like clean-X, or ex-finity? And there is always the upper-L search box.
***LSM Clinton[/](Lewinsky)Scandal MoveOn (Truly[*iv] Never Never Land)
*iv: see 3 minutes in till you google, Republicans say raise taxes(po lls ).
[* Follow-up]
[X= "I have never said that all tax cuts always pay for themselves."
Y= "You should never have to off-set the cost of a deliberate decision to reduce tax rates on Americans..."
Senator Kyl is not lying about what he has never said, literally, but see chart, and how tax cuts pay for themselves. But there is a two fold problem here. One, following my words in the equation. Two, following the chart. But it seems to me that actually, in the Permanent Tax Cuts category, it would be even harder to say. But it does seem to show a relative benefit to old tax rates mixed with Obama tax rates, and flip-flopping the Republican tax policy, as we have virtual mud from the trickle-down. And we even have pun with the bank and the cave.]
XIV: allegory of the cave (a,b,c,d,e)
or singular(a,b, c ,d,e,f,g,h,i,j)
[hint C.3: MoveOn / GPS]
[Last UL Search (a,b,c,d)]
Speaking of mud. RM Glitch host.
Thursday, October 13, 2016
Humpty Tikkun
a google TBA
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Humpty+Tikkun
http://www.mesorahmatrix.com/essays/2_TheBiblicalSourceforTikkunOlam.pdf
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3433653/jewish/Who-Came-Up-With-Tikkun-Olam.htm
http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/attempt-to-jump-start-israelpalestine-peace
https://www.learningtogive.org/units/we-are-partners-work-creation-tikkun-olam-private-religious/repair-world-why-private-religious
a (bs) TBA
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=humpty+tikkun
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Humpty+Tikkun
http://www.mesorahmatrix.com/essays/2_TheBiblicalSourceforTikkunOlam.pdf
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3433653/jewish/Who-Came-Up-With-Tikkun-Olam.htm
http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/attempt-to-jump-start-israelpalestine-peace
https://www.learningtogive.org/units/we-are-partners-work-creation-tikkun-olam-private-religious/repair-world-why-private-religious
a (bs) TBA
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=humpty+tikkun
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Checking In:
The Nation's New 4mat? Yeah, that's the ticket!
Tangent? Or see can't, or inverse of a co-sign?* Even a google of Charle Pride** found same.
* pardon my trig, it was "water cooler" sourced.
** A metaphor for America, diplomacy and justice
[In balance not necessarily a relationship. The particulars are different but is seems that there is a two for one[***] style, Obama if you will, that works in different system. There are dimensional differences in the branches and partisanship of the way we have evolved from the British, that ironically may be 4shadowed in theTea Party/Brown wavering.]
*** sound words that do not necessarily cross the Red C or Atlantic. The more dimensions? The Paul/Sanders Fed Audit Bill, the Palin/Paul Tea Party gap, the Democrat/Liberal dialogue 4knot?
[see update: 5-17-10 Legend Label introduced with Comity expanded labeling. But see Ribble ** I was noting that Pride and Rich find the same tune under a google.]
Tangent? Or see can't, or inverse of a co-sign?* Even a google of Charle Pride** found same.
* pardon my trig, it was "water cooler" sourced.
** A metaphor for America, diplomacy and justice
[In balance not necessarily a relationship. The particulars are different but is seems that there is a two for one[***] style, Obama if you will, that works in different system. There are dimensional differences in the branches and partisanship of the way we have evolved from the British, that ironically may be 4shadowed in theTea Party/Brown wavering.]
*** sound words that do not necessarily cross the Red C or Atlantic. The more dimensions? The Paul/Sanders Fed Audit Bill, the Palin/Paul Tea Party gap, the Democrat/Liberal dialogue 4knot?
[see update: 5-17-10 Legend Label introduced with Comity expanded labeling. But see Ribble ** I was noting that Pride and Rich find the same tune under a google.]
Thursday, March 04, 2010
A new day is dawning.
I wish to be circumspect on the Obama plan.
So I will can the hope and hype and just link or google.
No offense google, but what the...?
Well here or here.
[update:Really!Text and video , reconciliation, the new Obama? what to run on.]
So I will can the hope and hype and just link or google.
No offense google, but what the...?
Well here or here.
[update:Really!Text and video , reconciliation, the new Obama? what to run on.]
Labels:
Google,
Obama,
On Bi-Partisanship,
Pop Culture,
Ribble,
RSN,
TPM
Thursday, March 01, 2012
Rest in Peace: Andrew Breitbart
It is with no schadenfreude that

Yesterday, David Bender interviewed former Senator Alan Simpson, who really tore into Rick Santorum and the Stephenie Miller Show. I hope** that was not what put the "Journalist"* over the top. I regret putting any meaning into what were hopefully "natural causes", not that they are any better than the best intentions sometimes. His dreams or nightmares will live on.
*3-2-12 BS added...(i.e. blog search)
*** apparently it may be how "Google" can work for some.(note image replaced below)
4A: not to pun on a death but there are categories of writing and communicating. Why do you think they have wakes?^^
3-2-12(continued): In fact I think I will take it back a notch.

Note: Face moved and replaced.
(see "image"*** switch)
RIP: Respect in Place (Face adjustment)
Sunday, November 24, 2013
De-Boot
Akin to Reboot?*
Fortunate Google
*
(FP1)
Michael Lind whining centrists
Yuval Levin history divide way forward
Joseph Stromberg James Fallon/psycho'pathic
Heilprin/Keaten nuclear deal
Speaking of unfounded(FP2) links
[fff / ? ]
Tuesday, September 04, 2012
Charlotte 2012!
The DNC Convention!
Turn-around is fair play.
Missed sarcasm: watch word.
The watch word is turn around.
Bring it on!
The whole table.
PIG: Progress is Good!
(Not to Or well[!]...exactly)
On elements or style...

Table of Context[!](to follow)...
CAUTION though.
[Updates used to leave the original date of post intact. That changed recently.
I don't know if that is a Rovism or an AlGoreRhythm, but what the google or frack.]
[!]TOC
[take to footnotes**/under construction]
frack
google*
Rhythm
recently
though- (scroll-over)
or- exactly- table- whole- word - watch- sarcasm- fair play- around- turn- convention- DNC-
*see chart
(need other image?)
** might not

Turn-around is fair play.
Missed sarcasm: watch word.
The watch word is turn around.
Bring it on!
The whole table.
PIG: Progress is Good!
(Not to Or well[!]...exactly)
On elements or style...

Table of Context[!](to follow)...
CAUTION though.
[Updates used to leave the original date of post intact. That changed recently.
I don't know if that is a Rovism or an AlGoreRhythm, but what the google or frack.]
[!]TOC
[take to footnotes**/under construction]
frack
google*
Rhythm
recently
though- (scroll-over)
or- exactly- table- whole- word - watch- sarcasm- fair play- around- turn- convention- DNC-
*see chart
(need other image?)
** might not

Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Oh, what a web...
we weave when first we misattribute. "sic"*
But here(see footnotes) is the tangle thanks to Thom Hartmann.**
*not to mention misquote or evolve
** more tangle (thanks to embedded hyperlinks)
[footnotes: Michael Hudson, Six Minutes, Democracy Now]
[More run off or tangle courtesy of "google"(and Ctrl Find)and Thom Hartmann caller.]
[Speaking timing*** and that was another thread, but spins off of Cato and Henry George, or is it Tucker "George Will" Carlson.]
*** apologies for deep or rather unexpressed and anachronistic footnotes and 4A.
[subset of sovereignty or tangle]
But here(see footnotes) is the tangle thanks to Thom Hartmann.**
*not to mention misquote or evolve
** more tangle (thanks to embedded hyperlinks)
[footnotes: Michael Hudson, Six Minutes, Democracy Now]
[More run off or tangle courtesy of "google"(and Ctrl Find)and Thom Hartmann caller.]
[Speaking timing*** and that was another thread, but spins off of Cato and Henry George, or is it Tucker "George Will" Carlson.]
*** apologies for deep or rather unexpressed and anachronistic footnotes and 4A.
[subset of sovereignty or tangle]
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Truth Tellers
Thom Hartmann notes that the truth teller of the Democrats is Kucinich and for the Republicans it is Ron Paul, who notes the history of the Republican party as against wars. And thanks to a quick google, the first few paragraphs hits it out of the park **. "Way out", as it is put there. Or a slam dunk if you will.
That was still the situation when Clinton was president and even when the current Bush was campaigning against being nation builders and policeman to the world. Another point in this regard is that old Bush in a China Shop metaphor where:
when we broke it, we don't own it, but we might pay for it.
Final note: On Unity08 plans for a bipartisan ticket, I think it is crazy or at minimum won't work. Now, not that it won't succeed. But not necessarily for the country. It really is hard to take a negative attitude with something that seems so middle of the road, but then if we put the people in the middle of the road, they may just get run down. OK! So metaphors may not work, but the may make a point, and getting somewhere that has a point is the "hard work". There! Does that make any progress on the point. Well it may just be going round and round, but that may be another result, not that I am trying to get the geometry covered. But now that I have run that into the ground, I will take a tangent and note that there may be room for dialogue on the third party or third or fourth way. Dialogue and debate is happening within each party. If there are any outliers. Those hanging back; LaRouche (may get the point); Nader (I am not so sure); Bloomberg or Hagel; or not lastly Wesley Clark. But above we have noted, and I believe I recall now that my comparison (if not noted earlier) was between Ron Paul and LaRouche rather than Kucinich, that there are certain mavericks but at least they are participating now. I would harken back to my point about Red and Blue America and the threat to the green. It must be noted that "at the risk of being obvious" must have been too deep and the PI editors* changed my word "green" to "color" which put a completely different tint on my letter. My point is that Unity08 may be more about the green and may not get us out of seeing red.
*(In the last line of "the threat to the green" link, which may have been a threat to someone's green, if not not black and white enough to fit their grey matter.)
**11:35 AM amended [six paragraphs to be precise, I had not read much beyond "To many people, however..." and that is where we must remember the words of Rudy Guliani, on or shortly after September 11th, something like: Aren't you glad George Bush is president? Case closed. These guys cannot fight or debate without misconstruing the point or the enemy, period. Black and white enough?]
That was still the situation when Clinton was president and even when the current Bush was campaigning against being nation builders and policeman to the world. Another point in this regard is that old Bush in a China Shop metaphor where:
when we broke it, we don't own it, but we might pay for it.
Final note: On Unity08 plans for a bipartisan ticket, I think it is crazy or at minimum won't work. Now, not that it won't succeed. But not necessarily for the country. It really is hard to take a negative attitude with something that seems so middle of the road, but then if we put the people in the middle of the road, they may just get run down. OK! So metaphors may not work, but the may make a point, and getting somewhere that has a point is the "hard work". There! Does that make any progress on the point. Well it may just be going round and round, but that may be another result, not that I am trying to get the geometry covered. But now that I have run that into the ground, I will take a tangent and note that there may be room for dialogue on the third party or third or fourth way. Dialogue and debate is happening within each party. If there are any outliers. Those hanging back; LaRouche (may get the point); Nader (I am not so sure); Bloomberg or Hagel; or not lastly Wesley Clark. But above we have noted, and I believe I recall now that my comparison (if not noted earlier) was between Ron Paul and LaRouche rather than Kucinich, that there are certain mavericks but at least they are participating now. I would harken back to my point about Red and Blue America and the threat to the green. It must be noted that "at the risk of being obvious" must have been too deep and the PI editors* changed my word "green" to "color" which put a completely different tint on my letter. My point is that Unity08 may be more about the green and may not get us out of seeing red.
*(In the last line of "the threat to the green" link, which may have been a threat to someone's green, if not not black and white enough to fit their grey matter.)
**11:35 AM amended [six paragraphs to be precise, I had not read much beyond "To many people, however..." and that is where we must remember the words of Rudy Guliani, on or shortly after September 11th, something like: Aren't you glad George Bush is president? Case closed. These guys cannot fight or debate without misconstruing the point or the enemy, period. Black and white enough?]
Monday, October 19, 2009
Who gets it?
Not the helium but the humor.
Rep. Grayson has a sense of humor and deals with serious issues on Bill Maher's RealTime.
[Back in the Box:(my comment forestalled by login difficulties)
* potential inconcatenation** of intelligence and fear mongering or not being as out of the box or martial artistic as thought
** or is it deconcatenation***, but math and logic aside?
*** or unstrung Tao of Zen (in google we coin... a new word and failed)
[Third times a charm? Unconcatenation not.
Rep. Grayson has a sense of humor and deals with serious issues on Bill Maher's RealTime.
[Back in the Box:(my comment forestalled by login difficulties)
I believe (Jiu Jitsu in Afghanistan) does fit into his "despise"(d) "left-right boxes"(metaphor) more than the writer understands. And also less into the martial arts metaphor than he also understands. To me, there is difficulty equating(or rather comparing) war with diplomacy and yet there is also an intelligence factor that differs. To mix boxes (or analogies might be better), you have Rumsfeldian intelligence and then there is what is really out there * . War obviously relies more on secrecy, while diplomacy relies more on openness, however you will still have those that play a war game, whether in or out of the box or whether they are with us or against us.This is more than self-fulfilling loopiness.]
* potential inconcatenation** of intelligence and fear mongering or not being as out of the box or martial artistic as thought
** or is it deconcatenation***, but math and logic aside?
*** or unstrung Tao of Zen (in google we coin... a new word and failed)
[Third times a charm? Unconcatenation not.
Monday, December 05, 2011
Image of Original In Tent

Re: Sources
C W
Homer, Plato**, Hell'nistic, Hamiltonian/Jeffersonian *: Evolutionary Thinking***.
* less than random link/Google of the day?
not fully read yet,
never completely endorsed, unlike Labelists [Well...not exactly.]
** lede not
[The under lying(pun) under standing(literal) as well as substance, regards semantics. Now that is a pretty firm line for a fluid foundation.
See W(hint pun/ribble)
The history of the constitution falls into this spectrum. The Federalist Papers were an argument, for what does not matter, it won and lost, as the amendments suggest. The constitution was signed but not without compromise. And we were never on the same page again. This is my perspective without the usual qualifiers.]
*** How prophetic?
[Unoriginal In tent: related links without hints]
[On the other hand... looking for spectrum.]
[Given the field of the Republican Presidential race, no apologies are in order. Excuses maybe, blame yourself. BTW: not disappointed by Herman Cain, to drop out but carry the mess age to the table. But in honor of the Federalists, the non-party party, here is a third field or party or option. Caution!]
[NPR: Re-education]
[Update: Herman
Monday, February 18, 2013
Technical Difficulties!
SOP= standard operating procedure
i.e. progress in progress or process in process
Poetic justice? Or cultural calculus\yogurt or Pet Try dish.
Flow of WB(William Blake) who coined "sciousness" or Al Gore who algorerhythmed the google tubes*. Where am I going or coming from? Not Alaska, nor Area 51[!].**
A comment on the limitations and processes of communications and nature.
* reference Alaska Senator re: the inter-tubes
(FP1)
** nor Rush ah! (FP1) (a general endorsement of style and foundations)
i.e. progress in progress or process in process
Poetic justice? Or cultural calculus\yogurt or Pet Try dish.
Flow of WB(William Blake) who coined "sciousness" or Al Gore who algorerhythmed the google tubes*. Where am I going or coming from? Not Alaska, nor Area 51[!].**
A comment on the limitations and processes of communications and nature.
* reference Alaska Senator re: the inter-tubes
(FP1)
** nor Rush ah! (FP1) (a general endorsement of style and foundations)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


